Union of India and 3 Others. v. Smt.Kamalabai Hari Boarkar.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a counsel's note correcting an error in the record regarding the appearance of counsel for the petitioners in W.P. No. 130/1999 and directing necessary corrections to the judgment.
What the court decided
Counsel Note ST.5354-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
COUNSEL'S NOTE ST. NO.5354/2014 IN W.P. NO. 130/1999 (D)
(UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS VERSUS SMT.KAMALABAI HARI BORKAR)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 12, 2014.
It appears from a reading of the Counsel's Note that though learned counsel Ms Tanna holding for Shri R.S. Sunderam, Advocate had appeared on behalf of the petitioners, it was wrongly showed in the judgment dated 15.04.2014 that Shri N.P. Lambat had appeared for the petitioners.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Union of India & Others
- respondent
Smt. Kamalabai Hari Borkar
Coram
Vasanti A. Naik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajendra Shankarrao Satputaley Vs Central Bank of India through Its Chief Manager-Hrd and Others
Ashutosh S/O Vitthalrao Wikhar Vs Sau. Priti W/O Ashutosh Wikhar and Others
Ku.Rupali Chatarsing Ingale(Thakur). Vs the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims,Amravati and 2 Ors.
Sahebrao S/O Vitthalrao Raut and 7 Others Vs the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad Washim and Another