Dismissed
Seema Dattatraya Phuge v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/44/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-WP-44.2014
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2014
Seema Dattatraya Phuge.... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Tapan Thatte for the Petitioner.
Ms M.H. Mhatre, APP, for the State.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE &
P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 2014
P.C:
The petitioner is challenging second
FIR which has been registered against him for
the same set of facts for which an FIR has
already been registered. The learned APP
submits that in respect of the second FIR, “C”
Summary report has been filed before the
concerned Magistrate. In view of the said
statement, the petition does not survive and is
accordingly disposed of.
Seema Dattatraya Phuge
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court