Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal writ petition with liberty to file substantive proceedings. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition, keeping all contentions open.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a substantive petition or appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Cr.WP 4209 of 2013)
vat
Vaishali Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.4209 OF 2013
Mr.Dinesh Parakh
...Petitioner
Vs.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr.Saikumar Pathrudi M for Petitioner Mr. N.S. Fadia for Respondent No.1 Mrs. P.H. Kantharia-APP for the State **********
CORAM : V. M. KANADE , & P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 11, 2014
P.C. :
[P.D. KODE,J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
1/1
Vaishali Tikam
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Ors.
V.M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
