Petitioners challenged a lower order. The High Court held that a new order by the Additional District Magistrate disposed of the grievance and directed respondents to comply within one month.
Directed respondents to comply with the Additional District Magistrate's order within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 388 OF 2014
SHRI VIDYANAND KAMLAKANT AND 7 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. N. Pai, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:RANJIT MORE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:11th August, 2014
P.C.
Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2
his application along with the existing access road of four metres. By this order, it is further directed that in case of any objection, the Assistant Executive Engineer shall take help of the police and ensure that the electricity poles are erected and electricity connection is released to the interested parties herein, namely the petitioners.
U. V. BAKRE, J. RANJIT MORE, J.
SMA
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SHRI VIDYANAND KAMLAKANT AND 7 ORS
THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL ENGINEER AND 2 ORS
RANJIT MORE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
