Dismissing a contempt petition filed against respondents in a writ petition, the Court held that no case was made out for contempt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 222 OF 2013
ADV. SURENDRA B. BORKAR ... Petitioner Versus M/S. MAHALAXMI DEVELOPERS AND 9 ORS., ... Respondents
Petitioner in person.
Coram:RANJIT MORE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ.
Date:11th August, 2014
P.C:
Having heard the petitioner in person, we find that no case is made out in the contempt petition and accordingly, the petition stands dismissed.
U. V. BAKRE, J. RANJIT MORE, J.
EV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case out is made for contempt of court in the present writ petition.
ADV. SURENDRA B. BORKAR
M/S. MAHALAXMI DEVELOPERS AND 9 ORS.
RANJIT MORE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
