The single judge held that a writ petition is infructuous due to the passage of time and disposed of the matter.
Writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3783 OF 2001
(Ms. Sajiya Parveen d/o Abdul Rauf & ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders
Shri Ajinkya Kale, Advocate holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for petitioners Shri S.P. Daund, A.G.P. for State
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 1st October, 2014.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
fmp/3783.01
Ms. Sajiya Parveen d/o Abdul Rauf & ors.
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
A.V. Nirgude
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
