The bench disposed of the writ petition as the petitioner's grievance was already redressed based on a 2001 report. Consequently, the connected civil application was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3767.00
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3767 OF 2000 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4845 OF 2000
(Ram s/o. Vishwambharrao Mule Vs. The Director of Marketing,
Maharashtra State, Pune & ors.)
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE &
Registrar's ordersA.I.S. CHEEMA,JJ.
DATED : 11.09.2014
Mr.V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar,AGPfor
respondent/State.
Mr.A.N. Irpatgire, Advocate for R-3.
1.Heard both the sides. Learned
Counsel for the parties admitted that
in view of report dated 20.01.2001, the
grievance of the petitioner is also
redressed. Learned Counsel for the
respondents stated that the case of the
petitionerwouldbeconsidered
sympathetically in the light of the
report. In view of this assurance, the
writ petition stands disposed of.
2 wp3767.00
2.In view of disposal of the
writpetition,connectedCivil
Application does not survive and stands
disposed of.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.][A.V. NIRGUDE,J.]
snk /2014/SEP14/wp3767.00
Ram s/o. Vishwambharrao Mule
The Director of Marketing, Maharashtra State, Pune
A.V. Nirgude
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court