The Single Judge dismissed the continuation application in default due to the absence of the applicant, thereby also disposing of the related application.
Civil Application No.4623 of 2005 dismissed in default; CA 2485 of 2006 disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca4623.05
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4623 OF 2005 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.163 OF 2004
(Shantilal Deolal Jaiswal vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.)
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2485 OF 2006 IN
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4623 OF 2005
(Shantilal Deolal Jaiswal vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.)
OfficeNotes, Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances,
Court’s orders or
directionsand
Registrar’s orders.
None present for Applicant.
Shri V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for State.
....
CORAM: A.V. NIRGUDE AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2014
ORDER:
1. None present for Applicant. Civil Application
No.4623 of 2005 stands dismissed in default.
2. In the light of the order passed in Civil
Application No.4623 of 2005, Civil Application
No.2485 of 2006 also stands disposed of.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.] [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.]
asb/SEP14
Shantilal Deolal Jaiswal
State of Maharashtra
A.V. Nirgude
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court