Petitioner withdrew its writ petition regarding an abandoned tender process after Respondent No. 2 informed the court that no response was received for the tender.
Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition, if occasion arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp365114.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3651 OF 2014
Kisan Textile
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.Bhausaheb S. Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.R.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.M.BADAR, JJ. DATE :06th May, 2014
PER COURT:
1 Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 informs that there is no proper response to the tender notice and as such, a decision is taken to abandon the process of tender.
2 In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for Respondent No.2, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition, if occasion arises.
3 Leave granted.
Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed for.
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
JUDGE
A.M. BADAR
Kisan Textile
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
