Writ petition found infructuous due to passage of time and disposed of without costs. Rule discharged.
Writ petition disposed with no order as to costs; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP3316-97
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3316/1997
(BALDEO MARKAND BAGHELE & OTHERS VERSUS THE EDUCATION OFFICER (S), Z.P. & ANOTHER)
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : MAY 5, 2014.
Shri Jibhkate, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that due to passage of time, the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Baldeo Markand Baghale & Others
The Education Officer (s), Z.P.
Vasanti N. Naik
Ashvini S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
