The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to pursue the alternate remedy, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp305514.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3055 OF 2014
Vitthal s/o Vinayak Pungale
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.M.D.Narwadkar, advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.S.Tope, advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATE :04th August, 2014
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of alternate remedy available in law.
Leave granted. Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The appellate authority, while considering request for condonation of delay, that may occur in presenting appeal, shall have due regard to the fact of time spent in prosecuting remedy of writ petition before this Court.
V.L.ACHLIYA JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp305514
Vitthal s/o Vinayak Pungale
The State of Maharashtra
V.L.Achliya
R.M.Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
