Petitioner challenged a show cause notice issued under Section 111 Cr.P.C. which had become infructuous as the stipulated period expired. High Court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it, noting that fresh notice would be needed for new proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Wp 1688 of 2014)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 1688 OF 2014
Mohammed Nisar Taki Qureshi ...Petitioner Vs. Special Executive Magistrate and The Asstt. Commissioner of Police and Ors. ...Respondents ********** Mr.Moinddin Khan for Petitioner Mr.J.P. Yagnik -APP for the State
CORAM : V. M. KANADE , & P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 P.C. :
1/2
(Wp 1688 of 2014)
proceedings.
Vaishali Tikam
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition which challenged an infructuous show cause notice can be disposed of as barred.
Whether the court is required to address the apprehension regarding further proceedings on a notice that has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Nisar Taki Qureshi
Special Executive Magistrate
The Asstt. Commissioner of Police and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
