Bhaskar Kisanrao Kulkarni v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings for national highway was dismissed as devoid of substance following vesting in Central Government.
Writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings for national highway was dismissed as devoid of substance following vesting in Central Government.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
920 wp.2976.13.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2976 OF 2013
BHASKAR KISANRAO KULKARNI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sunil P. Sonpawale. AGP for Respondents: Mrs.S.G.Chincholkar. Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. A.V.Patil.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE and V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 01st July, 2014.
P.C.:
. The Petitioner is challenging the proceeding for acquisition of
landed property for construction of national highway The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent, on instructions, informs that a notification as contemplated under Section 3(A) was published on 14th January, 2013 declaring its intention to acquire the land. After hearing the objections as contemplated under Section 3(C), a notification for acquisition is published under Section 3(D)(1) on 23rd August, 2013. The declaration under Section 3(D) is final. The property under acquisition stands vested in the Central Government in view of SubSection (2) of Section 3(D). In view of above, the challenge raised in
the instant petition to the acquisition proceedings, does not deserve
2
920 wp.2976.13.sxw
consideration. The petition is devoid of substance and the same
stands rejected.
[ V. L. ACHLIYA, J. ] [ R. M. BORDE, J. ]
ndm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings deserves consideration.
BHASKAR KISANRAO KULKARNI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court