Petitioner was absent in two sessions despite being called out. The challenge to the B.Ed. admission process was declared infructuous due to the passage of time. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2874.13.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2874 OF 2013
Archana d/o Dnyaneshwar Teke .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2014.
PER COURT :
( V. L. ACHLIYA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Archana d/o Dnyaneshwar Teke
The State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. BORDE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
