operation of the distribution of the energy in Aurangabad was already transferred to GTL Limited. The grievance raised by the Petitioner pertains to the period during which the operation in respect of the energy supply was entrusted to MSEDCL. As such, the grievance raised by the Petitioner is required to be dealt with by the Internal Mechanism provided by MSEDCL and not by the Redressal Forum provided by GTL Limited. It is also pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent that in the event of failure of the Grievance Redressal Cell to decide the complaint, the Petitioner has a remedy available to approach the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, at Aurangabad. In the facts and circumstances of this case, we deem it appropriate to relegate the matter to the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Aurangabad for determination of the issue raised by the Petitioner in the complaint without going into the merits of the controversy involved in the matter. The ends of justice would be met, if the Petitioner is granted liberty to approach Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Aurangabad by presenting an appropriate complaint in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulations framed thereunder in the year 2006. If the Petitioner tenders a complaint to the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum within a period of six weeks from today, the same shall be taken into consideration by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum and decision shall be arrived at, on its own merit, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of presentation of such complaint.
