Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 2643 of 2014. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
903 wp.2643.14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2643 OF 2014
LUBNA OSMANKHAN PATHAN VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHRES
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shriniwas A. Kulkarni. AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 : Mr.S.K.Kadam. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr.P.S.Patil. Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. H.M.Shaikh.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE and V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 08th July, 2014.
P.C.:
. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ V. L. ACHLIYA, J. ] [ R. M. BORDE, J. ]
ndm
LUBNA OSMANKHAN PATHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
