This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2491-97
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2491/1997
(ALL INDIA S.C.s S.T.s AND BACKWARD CLASSES EMPLOYEES CO-ORDINATION COUNCIL & ANOTHER VERSUS W.C.L. & OTHERS)
Shri B. Lahiri, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.S. Mehadia, counsel for the R-1.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 21, 2014.
Shri Lahiri, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
All India S.C.s S.T.s and Backward Classes Employees Co-ordination Council & Another
W.C.L. & Others
Vasanti A. Naik
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
