Dismissed
Vd.Bharti Ramesh Patil v. Pre.Off., University and College Tribunal and Others
Bombay HCWP/1822/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
wp1822.9 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.1822 OF 1997
Vd. Bharti D/o Ramesh Patil
-vs-
Presiding Officer, University & College Tribunal, Nagpur and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
None for the petitioner.
Mrs.K.Joshi, AGP for the respondent No.2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : 21.04.2014.
Since the counsel for the petitioner is no more, a notice was issued to the petitioner on engagement of another counsel. It, however, appears from the office note that the notice is received back unserved, as the petitioner is not residing on the address stated in the writ petition.
Since the address of the petitioner is changed, it would not be possible for this Court to find out the address of the petitioner. In any case, it appears that the petitioner has not made any efforts to secure knowledge about the status of the petition, though the counsel for the petitioner had expired long back.
In the facts stated herein above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Vd. Bharti D/o Ramesh Patil
Presiding Officer, University & College Tribunal, Nagpur
VASANTI A. NAIK
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court