1 IN THE HIGH COURT
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted; points raised are kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1709wp2385.14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2385/2014.
M/s. Aditya Construction Company
-VERSUS-
The State of Maharashtra and others.
____________________________________________________________________________________Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Shri N.A. Padhye, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. K. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 Shri S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6. Shri V.G. Palshikar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 7 & 8.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P.R BORA, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2014.
Heard.
Since several disputed questions of facts arise
for determination in this Writ Petition, Shri A.S. Jaiswal, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the petitioner would avail the remedy of filing a Civil Suit. The learned Senior Counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Order
1709wp2385.14
2
Permission is granted. The Writ Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn. The points raised in the petition are kept open.
At the request of the learned Counsel
appearing on behalf of the respondents it is made clear that the interim relief would not operate in view of disposal of the writ petition.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
M/s. Aditya Construction Company
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
