The Court, in a civil application, held that the prayer required a full hearing of parties. It was adjourned for a final hearing on 26.09.2014, and the application was formally disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1709caw712.14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.A.W.NO. 712/2014 IN W.P.NO. 2258/2008.
Moreshwar Sitaramji Raut
-VERSUS-
The Hon'ble Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur and others.
____________________________________________________________________________________Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Shri H.D. Dangre, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Senior Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent No.3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P.R BORA, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2014.
Heard.
The prayer made in the Civil Application
cannot be granted without hearing the parties at length.
Hence, stand over to 26.09.2014 for final hearing.
The Civil Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Moreshwar Sitaramji Raut
The Hon'ble Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur and others
Vasanti A. Naik
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
