Petitioner withdrew the writ petition as he was employed by the State Government and was not desirous of pursuing the matter, leading to the disposal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2313-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2313/2014
(MANDA KRUSHNARAO DEULKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri V.N. Patre, counsel for the petitioner.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2014.
Shri Patre, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that though the petitioner has sought the compliance of the order at Annexure-V by the instant petition, the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition as the petitioner has been employed by the State Government in its service.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Manda Krishnarao Deulkar
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
