Dismissed
Krishna Y. Divekar and Anr. v. Pune Cantonment Board and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2150/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2150
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2150 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner
Mr.R.C.Master for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ.
DATE : JULY 30,2014.
P.C.
1The Advocate for the petitioner has
been granted discharge. The Court
service notice was ordered to be served
to the petitioners. Office remark
shows that the Court service notice is
returned unserved with the remark that
the petitioners are not residing at the
address given in the cause title. It
was the duty of the petitioners to
furnish correct address. Hence, we
dismissthepetitionfornon
prosecution. Rule is discharged.
Petitioner
Respondent Nos.1 and 2
A.S.Oka
A.S.Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court