Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, and pending civil applications are disposed of.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 2144 OF 2014
JALINDAR SOMA JADHAV VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R. B. Temak AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. G. Karlekar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
Dated: March 19, 2014
PER COURT :
( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
dyb
JALINDAR SOMA JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
