Petitioner challenging termination of teacher services rendered infructuous as services ended by management. Petition disposed of as unsustainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 2598/13
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2598/2013
Namdeo Satish More.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4.
Shri R.R. Mane, Advocate for respondent no.5.
Shri V.D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent no.6.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 18.03.2014
ORDER :
Since the services of the respondent no.6 - teacher
have been brought to an end by the management, the
grievance raised in the instant petition by the
WP 2598/13
petitioner does not survive. The petition is rendered
infructuous and hence disposed of as such.
(A.M. BADAR, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/c1831419
Namdeo Satish More
The State of Maharashtra
reputed teacher
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court