The High Court disposed of a criminal writ petition without expressing any view on merits, directing the Trial Court to take an appropriate view on framing of charges and keeping contentions open for future interference if warranted.
Writ Petition disposed of; contentions on merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT 1/1 25 wp 194413
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1944 OF 2013
Damodar Govind Jadhav ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents
Mr. D.W. Bhosale, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED: 13th January, 2014.
P.C.:
respect of framing of the charge. We have not expressed any view on merits of the matter. No interference at this stage is warranted. Report
is taken on file.
case are kept open.
(V.L.ACHLIYA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Damodar Govind Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
