The High Court of Bombay held that the criminal writ petition was misconceived. The court stated there was no case on merits and expressed no opinion on the merits. It disposed of the petition without reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Md.Saleem 1/1
WP2314.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRITPETITION NO.2314 OF 2013
Sunil Vithal Janbhor & Ors.- .petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. V. R. Shinde, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the State.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATED : 09th January, 2014.
P.C. :
Heard.
2 The petition is misconceived.
No case on merits. We do not express any opinion.
Petition is disposed of.
(V. L. ACHLIYA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Sunil Vithal Janbhor & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
NARESH H. PATIL
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
