Dismissed
Suryabhan Kaduba Sable v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/1897/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1897.2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1897 OF 2013
Suryabhan s/o Kaduba Sable
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
…. Respondents
Mr V. P. Latange, Advocate for petitioner Mr K. A. Ingle, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4
CORAM : N. W. SAMBRE, J. DATED : 15th JULY, 2014.
PER COURT : -
Mr V. P. Latange, the learned Counsel for the petitioner,
submits that, in view of the settlement of the dispute between the present petitioner and the Bank, the present petition no more survives.
Mr Ingle, the learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4, does not object to the same.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
( N. W. SAMBRE, J. )
Punde
Suryabhan s/o Kaduba Sable
The State of Maharashtra
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court