In a writ petition, the High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to change the suit property area, holding no case for interference as the trial had not commenced.
The writ petition failed and was dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1254.2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1254 OF 2013
Devid s/o Jeevan Jadhav and another
...Petitioners
Versus
Jailaxmi Purandar Naik and others
…. Respondents
Mr V. J. Dixit, Senior Counsel a/w Mr C. K. Shinde, Advocate for petitioners Mr Yadkikar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : N. W. SAMBRE, J. DATED : 15th JULY, 2014.
PER COURT : -
WP1254.2013
-2-
WP1254.2013
-3-
to begin, it is open for him to carry out the amendment in accordance with law. He submits that, the learned trial Court has rightly granted the amendment and the order does not call for any interference and prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.
to costs.
Punde
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court could interfere with the trial court's order granting amendment of the plaint to change the area of the suit property.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devid s/o Jeevan Jadhav and another
Jailaxmi Purandar Naik and others
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
