The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to the passage of time.
The writ petition has been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp187811.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1878 OF 2011
Krushna Bhikaji Jadhav & others
Petitioners
Versus
Bank of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.Girish V. Wani, advocate for petitioners.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE :24th June, 2014
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for petitioners, on instructions, submits that by passage of time, the petition is rendered infructuous.
Writ Petition stands disposed of having rendered infructuous.
V.L.ACHLIYA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
adb/wp187811
Krushna Bhikaji Jadhav & others
Bank of Maharashtra & others
R.M.Borde
V.L.Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
