Petitioner challenged rejection of injunction application in civil suit via writ petition. Bench held petition not maintainable as civil remedy sought. Disposed keeping merit issues open.
Writ petition dismissed without adjudicating merits as alternative civil remedy was available and pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1836.14.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 1836 OF 2014
Prakash Dashrath Gude ... Petitioner V/s. Director of Fisheries & ors. ... Respondents
Mr. I.M.Khairdi for the petitioner.
Ms. J.B. Kurup, 'B' panel AGP for respondents 1 to 4.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ .
25th July, 2014.
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
wp1836.14.sxw
2/2
already resorted to a remedy in the Civil Court. Keeping all issues on merits open, writ petition is disposed of.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
(NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by petitioner is maintainable given that he has already approached the Civil Court for a remedy.
Prakash Dashrath Gude
Director of Fisheries
NARESH H. PATIL
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
