Petitioner moved the Appellate Side to correct the minutes of the order dated 23.7.2014 to include the appearance of respondent counsel, which the Court allowed without evident discussion.
Counsel appearance for respondents 1 to 5 mentioned in the appearance clause of the order; order corrected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6466.09.sxw
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 6466 OF 2009
Subhash Motiram Meshram ... Petitioner V/s. Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Ltd. & others ... Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. H.G. Misar for respondents 1 to 5. Ms. M.S. Bane, 'B' panel AGP for respondent no.6.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ .
14th August, 2014.
P.C.
The petition is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 23rd July, 2014. The Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 5 submits that his appearance is not shown in the aforesaid order.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
(NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the minutes of the dated 23.7.2014 order be corrected to record the appearance of the counsel for respondents 1 to 5.
Subhash Motiram Meshram
Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Ltd.
NARESH H. PATIL
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
