The petitioner withdrew the writ petition in view of a subsequent judgment, resulting in the petition being disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1832
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1832 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade for the Petitioner
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.GADKARI,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 13,2014.
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the
petitioner states that in view of the
Judgment and Order dated 15th July 2014
passed in the Writ Petition No.11959 of
2013, he is not pressing the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed
of as not pressed.
_wp1832_
Respondent Nos.1 to 4
A.S. Oka
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court