The petitioners seek and obtain permission to withdraw the three writ petitions. The court dismisses the petitions accordingly as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue or law is discussed.
Permission to withdraw the petitions granted; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-10120,10121n10122.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10120 OF 2014 WRIT PETITION NO. 10121 OF 2014 WRIT PETITION NO. 10122 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Joel John Carlos for the Petitioners.
Shri Siddharth Shenoy holding for Shri Minoo Siodia i/by Rustamji & Ginwala for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.GADKARI, JJ DATED : 12TH NOVEMBER 2014
P.C.:
. Not on board. Taken on board.
Petitioners on instructions of the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these Petitions. Accordingly, the Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.S.GADKARI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
A.S. Oka
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court