The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad held that a writ petition was rendered infructuous due to the passage of time and disposed of the matter without further orders.
Petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
1732
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1732 OF 2012
ASHOK NAGNATH GULVE AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Solanke Shrikrashna B. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Mr. S. K. Kadam.
CORAM: R. M. BORDE AND V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED: 12th JUNE, 2014.
PER COURT:
instructions, states that by passage of time the petition is rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed of as such.
[V.L.CHALIYA,J.]
[R.M.BORDE, J.]
Dt.12/06/2014 ans/1732
ASHOK NAGNATH GULVE AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
R. M. BORDE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
