Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition in view of subsequent developments. The Court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn by discharging the rule.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition. Pending civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
142
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO. 142 OF 2001 WITH CA/7094/2005 IN WP/142/2001
VINAYAK @ NANDU BAPURAO SANTAN AND ORS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Mr. P. V. Mandlik, Senior Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 8. Mr. Aloka Sharma, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.9. Mr. Pradeep Deshmukh, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.9 and 12.
Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for Respondent No.10.
CORAM: R. M. BORDE AND V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED: 12th JUNE, 2014.
PER COURT:
-:(2):-
142
Rule discharged. Pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of.
[V.L.ACHLIYA,J.] Dt.12/06/2014 ans/142
[R.M.BORDE, J.]
Vinayak @ Nandu Bapurao Santan and Ors
State of Maharashtra and Ors
R. M. Borde
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
