Petition disposed as infructuous because the respondents had already passed an order under Section 33 of the Slum Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
WP/1529/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1529 OF 2014
M/s. Grace Mass Housing Corporation and Anr.
…..Petitioners.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
….... Respondents.
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. U.S. Upadhyay, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE: 12th September, 2014
P.C.:-
We are informed that this Petition has become infructuous since the Respondents have already passed an order under section 33 of the Slum Act. Petition is therefore disposed of as infructuous.
(P.D. KODE, J. ) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
BDPPS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Grace Mass Housing Corporation and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
V. M. Kanade
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
