Pramod Pandurang Pisal v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not present, did not appear, and was not keen on pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 935-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 935 OF 2014
Pramod Pandurang Pisal ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents ***
None for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & P. D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2014
PC.
. None appears for the petition. It appears that petitioner is not keen in pursuing the matter. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
[P. D. KODE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Pramod Pandurang Pisal
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
P. D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court