Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Kowli, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition. He states that the stay granted on 5 May 2014 be continued for further period of 15 days. Mr. Kadam, Senior Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 and Mr. Samdhani, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No.3 opposed extension of stay. 2) The petitioners are granted liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty as prayed for.

¶16

The interim stay granted earlier to continue for a further

¶17

WP-1250-14

¶18

ASN

¶19

2/2

¶20

period of 10 days from today with liberty to file fresh petition. 4) Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶21

Mr. Kowli learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner does not press the Chamber Summons No.225/2014 and seeks to withdraw the same. The Chamber summons is allowed to be withdrawn.

¶22

(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Ramesh Vyas Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Zakira Mohammed Yahya Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Ajay Madhusudan Marathe Vs Union of India and 10 Others

M/S. Skylink Developers and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and 11 Others

M/S.Bhoomiutsav Co-Operative Hsg.Soc.Ltd Vs Sridevi C.Pandya and 6 Ors.

Kamala C0-OP. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.