This order dismisses the criminal writ petition because the petitioner's counsel could not provide instructions, indicating the petitioner lacks interest in pursuing the matter. An interim order is vacated.
Criminal Writ Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2_wp_1121_1989.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1121 OF 1989
Vasimkhan Jamil Khan .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. K.M. Sanghani, for the Petitioner Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: P.D. KODE, J.
DATED: DECEMBER 04, 2014
P.C:
that Petitioner is not contacting him and as such he is not able to make any effective submission for want of instructions.
learned counsel for the Petitioner to advance submissions it seems that Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, dismissed.
Megha 1 of 1
Vasimkhan Jamil Khan
The State of Maharashtra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
