Petitioner withdrew criminal writ petition by consent. Court dismissed the petition and directed expeditious hearing of a pending revision application.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed. Pending revision application directed to be heard expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-1073-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1073 OF 2014
Ajit Hariram Lakhani .. Petitioner Vs. Miss Rani Mohanlal Shahani & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr.Nitin Sejpal and Ms.Pooja Bhojane, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.H.H. Ponda i/b. M/s.Rajeev Sawant & Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs.S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for Respondent – State.
…. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATED : NOVEMBER 14, 2014.
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Sejpal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2 After having argued the petition for quite some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would withdraw the petition.
3 The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed, as such.
4 By consent of the parties, it is directed that the revision application, which is pending before the Sessions Court, be expeditiously heard and decided.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
1/1
Ajit Hariram Lakhani
Miss Rani Mohanlal Shahani & Anr
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
