In a criminal revision application, the Court dismissed the matter due to the applicant's failure to appear when called, noting that counsel for the respondent stated the applicant had agreed to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :- 29.REVN.19.14
ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2014
Mohammed Aslam Nazir .. Applicant
Vs.
Mrs.Noor Fatima Aslam Nazir and another .. Respondents
None for the Applicant. Mr.Hitesh Thorat and Mr.Rehan Anzari, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, A.P.P for Respondent No.2- State.
CORAM : ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J. DATE : 11th November, 2014
P.C. :
None appears for the applicant when called out. Heard
Mr.Hitesh Thorat, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 who states that the applicant had agreed to withdraw the application.
(ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J.)
Mohammed Aslam Nazir
Mrs. Noor Fatima Aslam Nazir
State
ABHAY M.THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
