The single bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 10409 of 2014 as withdrawn when the petitioner's Senior Counsel sought leave to withdraw.
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10409 OF 2014
SHRI. SADGURU HAMAL KAMGAR SAHAKARI SANTHA, NANDED VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel with Mr. Sushant C. Yeramwar Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT:
1] Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Mandlik, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[A.M. BADAR] [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
SHRI. SADGURU HAMAL KAMGAR SAHAKARI SANTHA, NANDED
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
