A contempt petition where the petitioner requested leave to withdraw the petition based on subsequent developments, resulting in the petition being disposed of as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 176 OF 2014 IN CA/8784/2013
DEEPALLI DURGESH DONDE VERSUS DURGESH SURESH DONDE
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kshitij Surve, Advocate h/f. Mr. Hemant Surve, ADvocate Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER, 2014.
PER COURT:
1] In view of subsequent development, learned counsel, upon instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[A.M. BADAR] [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
DEEPALLI DURGESH DONDE
DURGESH SURESH DONDE
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
