Dismissed
Henry S.W.Thum v. Bipin Gupta
Bombay HCTS/59/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Suit and petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's absence despite notice in a testamentary cause.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Nitin
¶2
929-TS-59-1996
¶3
1
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
¶5
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 59 OF 1996
¶6
IN
¶7
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 680 OF 1995
¶8
| Henry S.W. Thum | … Plaintiff/Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| Bipin Gupta | … Defendant/Respondent |
¶9
None for the Plaintiff/Petitioner
¶10
None for the Defendant/Respondent
¶11
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE: 10TH JULY, 2014
¶12
P.C.:
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Henry S.W. Thum
- respondent
Bipin Gupta
Coram
AI extract
S.J. Kathawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S. Otarmal Kantilal and Co. Vs Ragini Vijay Bhtkhande
Nne Pharmaplan India Ltd.( Formerly Known a Spharmaplan India Ltd.) Vs M/S.Mission Vivacare Ltd.(Formerly Known as Mission Phar. Ltd.), Cin NO.U24230MH1993PLC072361
State of Maharashtra through Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs the Official Liquidator of M/S Chetan Foundries Ltd.
Gujrat Heavy Chemicals Ltd. Vs Glory Chemicals Ltd.