The court disposed of the Testamentary Suit and Petition as abated. The learned Advocate for the Plaintiff informed the court that the matters had ceased to subsist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ts 9 of 1999 (939).sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.9 OF 1999 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.139 OF 1997
Chandrakant J. Shah
…..Plaintiff
Vs.
Narendra J. Shah …..Defendant
Ms. P.M.Bhansali i/by Mr. Ketan Chothani, for Plaintiff. Mr. Saheb Ahmad i/by Mr. Akshay Vani, for Defendant.
CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 2nd JULY, 2014.
P.C.:-
that the above Testamentary Suit and Petition have abated and therefore, do not survive. In view thereof, the above Testamentary Suit
as well as Testamentary Petition are disposed of as abated.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)
1/1
ssp
Chandrakant J. Shah
Narendra J. Shah
S.J.Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
