2] In reply presented by respondents, it has been pointed out that the concerned reservation provided in development plan has undergone modification and sanction has been issued by the State Government for modification of part development plan. The reservation prescribed in respect of survey no.379 for Balakashram has been deleted and user of the site for commercial purpose has been permitted by the State Government. So far as other properties are concerned, the State Government has permitted utilisation of the concerned site for commercial purpose. In view of the modification approved by the State Government on 6/6/2009, the contention raised by the petitioner in that regard does not hold good. Another objection raised by the petitioner is in respect of illegality committed by the Municipal Council for awarding contract on B.O.T. basis and awarding lease hold rights in relation to commercial complex in favour of private traders. It is contention of the petitioner that the procedure u/s 92 of the Act has not been adhered to and the Municipal Council has committed illegality and representation is tendered by petitioner in that behalf to the Collector on 14/3/13 and 14/4/13. It is stated that in pursuance to the complaint made by petitioner in respect of construction and award of leasehold rights without sanction of the State Government, explanation is called by Collector from respondent no.4, and matter is under consideration of Collector.
