Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a public interest litigation; the court dismissed the petition by recording it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
62
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders. of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 62 OF 2014
ASHT BHUJA NATH MRITYUNJAYA NATH TRIPATHI, AURANGABAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Joshi Rahul G. GP for Respondent: Mr. S. V. Kurundkar.
CORAM: R. M. BORDE AND A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATED: 7th MAY, 2014.
PER COURT:
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
[A.M.BADAR,J.]
[R.M.BORDE, J.]
Dt.07/05/2014
ans/62
Asht Bhuj Nath Mrityunjaya Nath Tripathi
The State of Maharashtra and Others
R. M. Borde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
