In this PIL, the High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition by noting that the same issues were being examined in another case, Cri.PIL No.41 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
kambli
pil-242-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.242 OF 2013
Nainesh Suresh Dolas ...Petitioner v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Sachin U.Dhakephalkar for the petitioner. Mr.V.P.Malvankar, “A” Panel Counsel for the respondent-State.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S.SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 7 APRIL 2014
P.C.:
In this public interest litigation the petitioner has prayed for directions to the State Government to fill in vacant posts in the police department at the earliest.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
Nainesh Suresh Dolas
The State of Maharashtra
MOHIT S. SHAH
M.S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
