Remanded

Sri. Ravindra Dattaram Waikar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Jun 2014PIL/135/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that the entire cause of action for the PIL arose in Mumbai. The petition was transferred to the Original Side with a direction for consequential amendment within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of the petition to the Original Side with direction for consequential amendment within two weeks.

What the court decided

Sri. Ravindra Dattaram Waikar and Ors. Vs the… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2014)

Ladda

pro-2-pil-135-14.doc

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶6

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.135 of 2014.

¶8

Ravindra Dattaram Waikar & others vs. The State & others.

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda	Court's or Judge's orders
of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.

¶10

Mr Ashish P. Pawar for the Petitioners.

¶11

Mr V.S.Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 10 and 12.

¶12

CORAM : A.S. OKA AND A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ. DATE : 25^th JUNE, 2014.

¶13

P.C.:-

¶14

Not on board. Taken on board.

¶15

The entire cause of action for filing this Public Interest Litigation by which jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is invoked, has arisen in Mumbai. We, accordingly, transfer this petition to the Original Side. The consequential amendment shall be carried out by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.

¶16

(A.S.CHANDURKAR,J).

¶17

(A.S. OKA,J)

¶18

1 / 1

Sri. Ravindra Dattaram Waikar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Sri. Ravindra Dattaram Waikar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurdino Jiwatram Kukreja Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sandeep Suresh Ghadge Vs Pandurgang Sahakari Sakhar Karkhanan Ltd. and Ors.

Ajim Abbas Mulani Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Govt of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sandeep Suresh Ghadge Vs Pandurgang Sahakari Sakhar Karkhanan Ltd. and Ors.

Rajeev Omprakash Gupta Vs the Government of India and Others

Sudhir Pralhad Barge Vs the Commissioner, Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Shaikh Ayyub Shaikh Shabir Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The Indian Express and Anr. Vs Mathew Yanmal, Gurukul Godavari Balak Ashram, Pune

Shri. Ramesh Revansiddha Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept and Ors.

Shri. Ramesh Revansiddha Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept and Ors.

Mr. Prakash Rajaram Taware Vs the Bhiwandi Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, Islampura and Anr.

The Mayani Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd, Mayani, through Mr. Prakash Ganpati Chothe Vs the Judge of the Co-Operative Court, Satara and Ors.

Ramchandra Baburao Kachare and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Smt. Baby Sapura Yakub Mhaldar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Urban Development Dept and Ors.