In a notice of motion for appointing a receiver and injunction in a specific performance suit, the Bombay High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution due to the absentees of the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms 3102-2008.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3102 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2614 OF 2008
Gorkap Properties and Investments Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. …Applicants / Plaintiffs vs. Mrs.Zahida Suhel Sultan & Ors. ...Defendants
Mrs.Zahida Suhel Sultan & Ors.
None present.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
23 JULY 2014
P.C. :
The Notice of Motion is taken out by the Plaintiffs for appointment of Court Receiver and injunction in respect of the suit property in a specific performance suit. On the last occasion, i.e. on 16 July 2014, none appeared for the Plaintiffs and the matter stood over till today. Even today, none appears for the Plaintiffs.
The Notice of Motion is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Gorkap Properties and Investments Pvt.Ltd., Gorkap Properties and Investments Pvt.Ltd. & Anr.
Mrs.Zahida Suhel Sultan, Mrs.Zahida Suhel Sultan & Ors.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
